Trees, wolves & unintended consequences - Sweden June 2018
Sweden is a country of trees. 23 million hectares of them. Over
half of the country’s total area. So its easy to assume biodiversity would be
rich and large carnivores like wolves and bears would have plenty of space to
themselves. Not so. With the negative press around the impact of farming on the
environment it would also be easy to assume that the declining area of farmland
is a good thing for biodiversity in Sweden.
Also no true.
So what’s going on?
The Swedish forestry industry is very successful. As a timber merchant friend of mine neatly
put it the Swedes produce good wood and the world needs it. But spruce monoculture is taking its toll on
the environment. It suits large
herbivores very well. Roe deer &
moose flourish in this habitat and so their predators flourish too. But the loss of farmland to more forest is causing
loss of pollinator habitat, reduced plant diversity and declining farmland bird
numbers. Traditional small livestock
farms are struggling to survive and as they disappear into more spruce forestry
so do the open woodland grazing systems that supported abundant wildlife.
Interestingly the wolf and bear are implicated in the
decline of farmland too. On Gunnar and
Traute’s farm 3 hours north of Stockholm, in the forested central belt of Sweden,
the cost of protecting their stock from predation is becoming uneconomic. Gunnar and Traute milk 19 cows and have a
herd of around 50 cattle including followers and beef. Their land area isn’t big, but they manage 28
km of electric fencing to keep their stock safe from attack. They received financial
support for half the capital cost of the fencing from a government scheme but
the rest of the cost and the on-going management in strimming round, checking
and repairs is borne by them. Tempting
to give up farming and grow trees.
But hang on a minute – how important is this fencing
anyway? Surely there is plenty of food
in the forest? What about all those deer
& moose? Farm animals are easy pickings
for wolves and Lynx – a Friday night take away as opposed to a Sunday roast
from scratch. Anyone with chickens will
know that a fox will happily scale a fence to take your layers whilst there are
rabbits hopping around everywhere.
Traute told me about her elderly friend and neighbour who had recently
lost her small flock of sheep in one go to a pack of wolves. Devastated and giving up was how she described
her.
Wolves are also smart and learnt behaviour is something the
carnivore conservationists are constantly looking out for. Benny at De 5 Stora (‘the big 5') carnivore
information centre in Jarvso, explained that wolves causing regular problems to
livestock farmers will be a priority for culling as part of population
management quotas which the government produce each year. The aim with this approach is to have a wolf
population that stays away from people and livestock by removing wolves that learn
to raid farms for their food.
Lynx, bear, wolverine and wolves all have target population
numbers in Sweden, above which animals are culled on licence. But despite the
over 80% approval rating for hunting in Sweden, culling causes huge conflict in
the country. Gunner Gloersen of the
Swedish Association of Hunting described the debate over culling large
carnivores as worse than ever. He blames
a vocal minority with a loud voice. Hunting, he says is imbedded in Swedish
culture and society and the conflict around wolves is therefore more of a
social & cultural issue to do with rural ways of life, than actually about
conservation.
So what does all this mean?
For wolves times are pretty good.
They are back from extinction in Sweden and their conservation is near
the top of the list of priorities. The
government wants more wolves in the south of Sweden, where a large proportion
of the people live and most of the farming is done. Bears continue to do well despite
their blundering raids on bins and bee hives that cause more nuisance than harm;
and reindeer herders in the north of Sweden are now paid to protect Lynx and wolverine to lift numbers in the mountainous regions.
But for farmers in the ‘wolf belt’ (central wolf region of
Sweden) the situation is less rosy. Traditional
livestock farming systems like at Gunnar & Traute’s are hard work and lack
profit. Insufficient agri-environmental support and money for fencing means
many people are no longer interested in this way of life. Land is put down to forestry for the benefit
of the next generation and jobs in farming disappear. Is this such a bad thing, my timber merchant
friend might ask? The world needs wood
and Sweden is good at producing it. And
maybe he’d be right. Are farming systems
that can’t make money and don’t fit in with large carnivore conservation really
worth saving in Sweden? I don’t know.
But the people deciding should surely be those on the ground, living and
breathing the situation. It is after all
their knowledge that will deliver the practical solutions for conservation and it is their livelihoods that are in the balance.
Comments
Post a Comment